
Group C, or the ‘Group of Death’, is the mutated result of Austria and Switzerland’s selection as co-hosts. For the ‘benefit’ of the tournament the hosts (or in this case co-hosts) are given a position as top seed, with the logic being that it may give them an easier route out of the group stage. Unfortunately in this tournament that plan has backfired. Austria and Switzerland are joined by holders Greece and qualification leaders Holland in what must be the weakest quartet of top seeds in finals history. The two co-hosts were still every nation’s first choice of opponents in the group stage, the Greeks only slightly less so despite their status as holders, and The Dutch were effectively punished for a decent qualifying campaign by being seated alongside such a weak trio.
Ultimately criticism should rightly be levelled at UEFA for their choice of hosts. Whilst smaller nations in Europe deserve a shot at hosting the European Championships, the policy of pairing two low ranked nations as co-hosts should be dispensed with. Sure, UEFA could argue that a lot can happen rankings-wise in the six years between the choice of hosts being made and the competition taking place, but surely they spotted that neither Austria or Switzerland have been pulling up trees in the championships in recent years. If this policy of co-hosting is to continue then a weaker footballing nation must be paired with a stronger one. Holland and Belgium in 2000 is a good example, as is Poland and the Ukraine in four years time.
Another brief rant before we occupy ourselves with Group C: why have UEFA decided that it would be a good idea for the teams in Groups A and B, and C and D to face each other in both the quarter and semi-finals? The manner in which the schedule has been rigged presents the unpalatable prospect of two teams facing each other in the final game of the group and then again two games later in the semi-final. Over-familiarity leads to dull football much of the time (we call this the Liverpool-Chelsea equation). Far better for teams to play new opponents from the other half of the draw, surely.
And breathe…..
So to Group C, and let’s begin with that enigmatic lot, Holland. For the first time in a very long time the Dutch, classically painted as a disparate bunch, aren’t bickering amongst themselves. The camp is tranquil, harmonious, unified. Clarence Seedorf, the player most likely to cause a scene, has gone. So, what’s the problem?
Well, for the first time in a very long time the Dutch can’t hide behind the excuse of not liking each other very much. Finally the footballing maestros are getting along, which means that the only issue present is whether the Dutch are actually good enough to challenge at Euro 2008. And, to many, they are clearly not.
This, in part, is down to the coach, Euro legend and scorer of that goal, Marco Van Basten. From such lofty playing heights, Van Basten has become a manager best described as pragmatic. He has decided that The Dutch should put efficiency above aesthetics, putting an emphasis on counter-attacking over silky posession-heavy football. It is a decision which has been received frostily, most notably by probably the one player revered above Van Basten in Holland. “Winning is not enough,” barked Johann Cruyff, when asked about Van Basten’s methods. “There also needs to be beautiful football.” Another dissenting voice is that of David Winner, who wrote about the singular ethos of Dutch football in his excellent book Brilliant Orange. He described the current playing style as “rather ugly, boring football.” For a man so in thrall to the Dutch style, this is damning stuff.
Van Basten’s decision to adopt a counter-attacking approach is a strange one. Counter-attacking football relies on a sturdy defence, and the Dutch defence is, at times, comically bad. How bad? Well, their starting back four contains not only the dubious talents of Wigan’s Mario Melchiot, but also those of Andre Oojer. In defensive midfield sit Demy De Zeuww of AZ Alkmaar and FC Twente’s Orlando Engelaar; decent footballers (with a nice range of passing) but heirs to Gullit, Rijkaard, De Boer they are not.
The Dutch are also severly hampered by a lack of width. Ryan Babel has already withdrawn from the squad through injury and Van Basten confirmed yesterday that Arjen Robben, revitalised after a good second-half of the season at Real Madrid, will miss the opening game against Italy. Van Basten had the opportunity to replace Babel with another winger, but, in a depressing indication of the current climate of Dutch football, instead elected to fill the position with a defender, the wretched Khalid Boularouz. As a result the Dutch have but one natural winger, Ibrahim Afellay, though he is unlikely to see much playing time at Euro 2008. Instead expect to see Dirk Kuyt running around aimlessly on the right wing tonight against the Italians.
The saving grace for this Dutch side may be its selection of strikers. Discounting Kuyt, who would never attempt anything as interesting as scoring a goal, Holland have the still-magnificent Ruud Van Nistelrooy, the wonderfully-monikered Jan Venegoor of Hesselink, a fully fit Robin Van Persie, and the new star of Dutch football, Klass Jan Huntelaar. If they perform the Netherlands might just find their way out of Group C.
Continuing the theme of dubious national team coaches is France’s Paul O’Grady lookalike, Raymond Domenech. Famously, Domenech is a strong believer in Astrology, and allegedly sometimes uses horoscopes to determine team selection. Brian Clough he ain’t.
Domenech has quite a selection of stars at his disposal, but his reliance on big names could be costly. Thierry Henry and Patrick Vieira, in particular, have had poor seasons for club and country but are still considered definite starters if fit. Indeed Vieira’s position as first choice midfielder is particularly baffling, as he is struggling with injury and form at present. Domenech has actually called up Matthieu Flamini as a replacement for the Inter Milan player, but intends to send Flamini home early if Vieira is deemed fit to play. That’s right, Matthieu Flamini, one of the best players in the Premier League, cannot even hold down a place in the French squad. But wait, there’s more. Jean Alain Boumsong has made the squad!
If Domenech can avoid playing Boumsong, the French really should qualify, as they have a truly breathtaking group of attackers. Frank Ribery is one of the most exciting talents in football, as evidenced by a stunning season just gone with Bayern Munich. Samir Nasri, Arsenal-bound, is another marvellous prospect. Florent Malouda is a far better player than a disappointing season with Chelsea suggests. Batefemi Gomis has been called the new Didier Drogba and has impressed in pre-tournament friendlies. Finally there is Karim Benzema, a phenom reminiscent of the young Ronaldo. In a few years time he may be considered one of the world’s top players, yet in this confusing French set-up he probably wont even be given a starting place.
Italy are probably favourites to escape Group C, despite lacking a truly world-class centre back after an injury to Fabio Cannavaro. It’s up front where the Italians look most potent. No Francesco Totti (which means, hopefully no Totti-related puns), but Luca Toni has taken on a tallismanic role for the Italians after an impressive first season with Bayern Munich. He is supplemented with the attacking talents of diminutive Antonio Di Natale, the hotly-tipped Fabio Quagliarella as well as Genoa’s Marco Borriello. Also present is the brilliantly unstable Antonio Cassano, who could be the star of the tournament if he manages to stay sane. And let’s not forget the flickering brilliance of Alex Del Piero, still scoring goals at 87. In midfield Pirlo, De Rossi and Gattuso should keep things neat and tidy.
Romania are probably sick of their status as the ‘…and finally’ team of Group C, but it has allowed them to quietly prepare without any interruptions. They certainly shouldn’t be underestimated, having taken four points off the Dutch in qualifying. Romania boast solidity throughout the side. Goalkeeper Bogdan Lobont oozes experience, having played for Ajax, Fiorentina and Dinamo Bucharest. Right back Cosmin Contra has had a wonderful season with Getafe, scoring some great goals along the way. Stefan Radu is a solid, technically astute central defender. Roma’s Christian Chivu, familiar to England fans who remember the game against Romania at Euro 2000, will look to control the midfield, while up front is the undoubtedly talented Adrian Mutu. Mutu is a very different player from the misfit sacked by Chelsea a few years back. Now at Fiorentina, he has had a tremendous season, and a starring performance at Euro 2008 will surely confirm his footballing redemption. Romania certainly wont be the group whipping boys, but they’ll probably have to hope that one of France and Italy underachieve in order to qualify.
Prediction
France sneak past Romania, while Holland manage to hold a slow-starting Italy. France draw with the Dutch, and Italy spark to life against the Romanians. Romania kill off Holland’s qualification chances with a victory over them and the French and Italians play out a languid draw. Italy and France to qualify.
Player to watch: Daniele De Rossi (Italy)
Two years ago at the World Cup, De Rossi, a first choice starter for Italy, was sent off in their second group game against the U.S.A for a deliberate elbow on Brian McBride. He didn’t start another game in the tournament, and despite scoring a penalty in Italy’s World Cup winning shoot-out against the French, probably felt on the periphery of the Italians celebrations. Since Germany 06 De Rossi has evolved into one of the best midfielders in Europe, providing strength and stability to an ultra-attacking Roma side. For Italy he has become the heartbeat of the team. While Gennaro Gattuso roars around crippling opponents and Andrea Pirlo plays dainty passes, De Rossi provides an attacking thrust. He’s sort of like the Italian Jermaine Jenas. Except much, much better.